homeProgramspast program reports

BUILDING OUR SPIRITUALITY TOGETHER

TRAINING FOR TRAINERS - A WORKSHOP FOR YOUNG ADULT LEADERS OF THE NORTHEAST UNITARIAN UNITARIAN UNION
Shillong, Megalyaha, India January 8-12, 2006

The workshop was a resounding success, far exceeding the expectations and hopes of its organizers. On a scale of one to ten, it was at least a fifteen. The energy and enthusiasm of the participants was palpable. Some of the local leaders declared it the most important event in many years for the future of Unitarianism in the Khasi Hills. The thirty five carefully selected young adult leaders were unanimous in their praise and in urging that comparable workshops be conducted in the future. Several of the participants declared that, although having been born Unitarians, this was the first time that they had begun to have an inspiring vision of their own faith. A brainstorming session about the Union led to a long list of strengths, weaknesses, threats, and opportunities. After beginning a discussion of the list in small groups, it was resolved to try to turn the weaknesses and threats into opportunities, and to continue the conversations at the forthcoming Youth Wing gathering at the Union’s annual gathering in April. In a moving "graduation" ceremony, all the participants pledged to carry forward the results of the workshop in their home congregations.

Background:
The idea of the workshop was initiated by Rev. Olivia Holmes, former Director for International Relations of the Unitarian Universalist Association, in consultation with Khasi Unitarian leaders. Barbara Beach, Treasurer of the International Council of Unitarians and Universalists, proposed that it be a joint project of the Council and the UUA, with the hope that it might become a prototype for similar workshops for other Council member groups. The program was funded by grants of DOLLARS AND SOURCES.

Preparation:
The planning for the contents of the workshop was led by Rev. Holmes and the American faculty leader, Rev. Abhi Janamanchi. They consulted closely with the ministers of the Union to discern the concerns and needs of the participants.

These ministers worked together to select the thirty five participants. All are leaders within their own congregations. At least two were invited from a congregation, understanding that two would have significantly more motivation and effectiveness when they returned home. There were also a few auditors who could not be full participants because of work or family commitments. Ages ranged from 17 to 45.

The workshop was held in the residential conference center of the University of North East India. It was important that the participants lived and ate together. While many had previously been acquainted, the setting provided an opportunity to encourage significant bonding.

The faculty included several of the Union's ministers. Rev. H. H. Mhormen has studied at the Unitarian College in Manchester, U. K. he Revs. Pearl Greene Marbaniang and Derrick P. Pariat have been active in the ICUU and attended its recent conference at Monserrat in Spain. Bah Khlur Mukhim is a professor at the local college, and comes from a family that worked very closely with Margaret Barr in Kharang. The overseas members were Rev. Janamanchi and David Shaw from the U. K. and Rev. Richard A. Kellaway from the U. S. Shaw is a trained teacher of leadership development and is currently studying for the ministry. Kellaway has been active in international interfaith work for nearly fifty years and has had extensive experience in working with a variety of faith communities.

After extensive preliminary planning by email and phone, the faculty gathered a day in advance of the workshop to become acquainted and to solidify the program plan.

It was determined that the workshop would be most effective if the participants were divided into small Credo groups of about six persons. The Khasi faculty members selected the leaders and assigned the participants in hopes that this would make them varied, balanced, and effective.

It was assumed that the program would have to be bilingual. However, it quickly became clear that the participants had sufficient English for most of the presentations to be in that language with occasional digressions into Khasi.

The Workshop:
There were three basic components: lectures, small group discussion, and worship.

Lectures:
Janananchi, Kellaway, and Shaw each made presentations on The Art of Worship.

Marbaniang and Mohrmen discussed the history and character of Khasi Unitarianism, and Janamanchi, Kellaway, and Shaw presented brief histories of British and American Unitarian and Universalism.

All of the faculty members except Mukhim shared their personal understandings of Jesus with reference to historical and contemporary scholarship.

Shaw led the sessions on leadership development, emphasizing the difference in styles and the importance of inclusion and dialogue.

Kellaway led those on credo development. The plan was to have each participant develop a personal credo before the end of the workshop. He created a number of questions to guide discussion in the three small group conversations.

Pariat challenged them to work towards a positive statement of Khasi Unitarian faith. The result was the brainstorming list of strengths, weaknesses, threats and opportunities. (The list is attached.)

Credo Groups:
Each group met for four sessions. They were invited to name themselves. It was understood that their conversations would be in Khasi. No faculty members participated.

Beyond discussing the credo questions, they also met to consider their personal understanding of Jesus. The brainstorming list about the future of the movement was divided into six categories, and each group was given one to discuss.

Worship:
The two initial services were presented by faculty members. Each credo group was asked to present a service with an emphasis on creativity and quality. They were in both English and Khasi. Hymns were sung in Khasi to familiar (to Westerners) Welsh tunes. (The Welsh Presbyterian missionaries got there first.)

Janamanchi and Makhim directed an experience of guided meditation.

Surprises:
The group was eager to sing, and at several points it emerged almost spontaneously. Often it was encouraged and led by Rev. Nangroi Suting.

Several participants suggested a talent show. There was an immediate and eager response. The presentations, at the end of a busy day, were organized by the credo groups, meeting informally between sessions. It was creative and exuberant.

Bah Khlur Mukhim offered 6:30 A. M. Yoga sessions; a large percentage of the participants attended.

Evaluations:
Thirty persons responded to a questionnaire created by the Khasi members of the faculty. Some ticked more than one option.

  1. What were your hopes and expectations before coming to the training?
    Most of the responses expressed a hope for developing leadership skills and gaining a deeper understanding of the Unitarian faith.
  2. What is your opinion about the worship?
    Very Good, 8; Interesting, 15; Not creative enough, 0; Need some more, 7
  3. Do you think the sessions on Art of Worship led by Abhi, David, and Richard will be of any help to you for the growth of your congregation?
    Yes, 30; No, 0 Many comments about a broader understanding of preparation and presention
  4. What is your opinion about the Leadership Development part of the program?
    Excellent, 20; Good, 9; Fair, 1; Not so good, 0. Several comments.
  5. Your remarks on the slot devoted to Khasi Unitarian history led by Rev. H. H. Mohrmen and Rev. P. G. Marbaniang
    Helpful, 27; Not helpful, 0; Complicate, 1; Not informative, 0
  6. Your remarks about the Credo Groups
    Useful, 19; Not useful, 0; Interesting, worth a try, 15; Not relevant, 0
  7. Your opinion about the item in the programme with regard to Jesus
    Mostly all positive about their informative nature
  8. Give us your opinion about the Guided Meditation part of the programme
    Very positive responses. Some will introduce it in their own congregations. Some found it more valuable than prayer.
  9. How positive were you about stating your faith before you came to the training and how positive are you now?
    Varied statements about before; almost everyone stated that they felt more positive now.
  10. Did you face any problem while in the training with regards to:
    Food, 1 (first day); Lodging, 0; Communication, 0; Any other, 0
  11. Does the training meet your expectations?
    Yes, 23; No, 0 ; Somehow, 7
  12. What did you benefit most from the training?
    Worship training; incentive to explore more deeply; leadership; being more punctual and disciplined; inspired; confidence; more knowledge about my religion; living a spiritual life; (courage, confidence, wisdom, sympathy); to know what Unitarians really are—including around the world; art of meditation; learn to live and give more; credo groups; to know more about Jesus; to value others thoughts, words and actions; built my spiritual strength much better
  13. Do you think that we should continue such programmes in the future?
    Yes, 30; No, 0
  14. Your ideas on how we can improve if we conduct similar programs in the future
    consult with congregations about who's invited; include yoga and music; include more people; give preparatory materials in advance – on credo, for example; more inputs from the "outside world" larger faculty with additional ideas; more on art of worship and Jesus; more breaks "time out" make the English language presentations simpler; more youths; a longer workshop with more time for presentations and discussion; do it annually; do a similar program for children; more spiritual programmes; introduce debate

Perhaps the most challenging task for most of the participants was to develop a personal credo statement. The concept was new and confusing. In fact, most of them did not do it. However, during the time on the final morning when each participant was asked to share a statement, there were some extraordinary personal testimonies. The most compelling ones came from those who stated that they had been born into Unitarian families, but had never actually understood the faith, or even ignored it. The testimony centered on telling that they now understood it much better, accepted it, and were eager to share it with their own congregations and the larger community.

Faculty Evaluation and Follow-up

We were all thrilled by the responsiveness and enthusiasm of the participants. The Khasi leaders felt a sense of a rebirth for the movement, and that the leaders of the future had been present with us in the workshop. It was agreed that the momentum created there should be nurtured and developed into an action plan.

A concern was expressed for the Khasi leaders who did not participate in the workshop. How can they be included to share in some of the ideas and be encouraged to share in the enthusiasm?

The participants will be gathered again at the annual conference of the Youth Wing in April. Kellaway and the Khasi ministers will work on refining the SWOT analysis to try to change some of the identified weaknesses and threats into opportunities.

The credo groups will be gathered again at the conference and new groups will be created from the additional participants. They will all do a check in on individual situations and to tell what they had done as a result of their workshop participation before discussing the challenges emerging out of the SWOT analysis.

Janamanchi suggested creating an email discussion group to keep the conversation going. He also suggested that some of the themes identified in the SWOT analysis could be developed into pamphlets for outreach.

Mukhim commented that it was very valuable to hear participants tell of their connections with earlier generations of leaders. He noted that the SWOT analysis was a very good indicator of the present state of the movement. As a non-minister, he expressed his awareness that there were now major expectations of the Minister's Association, and commended them on their willingness to undertake vital leadership responsibilities.

Replication?

ICUU leaders have expressed the hope that this workshop might be a pilot that could be replicated with other member groups. Some of the factors that made this one so successful cannot be easily replicated in other venues.

The Northeast India Unitarian Union is an established institution with committed and experienced leaders. The workshop participants were all leaders within established (if sometimes small) congregations. They all have a personal history within their movement.

The factors that made this workshop so successful include:

  • surveying the particular needs of this Unitarian community;
  • a commitment by the Minister's Association to provide strong support and leadership;
  • careful selecting and recruiting the participants;
  • choosing teams from a congregation;
  • requiring full time attendance in a residential facility;
  • working with the workshop organizers to develop the program and select local and international faculty;
  • planning for much of the work to be done in small groups and selecting leaders and participants in advance;
  • advance and daily faculty meetings to evaluate progress with the flexibility to modify the program in response to participants concerns.

—Rev. Richard A. Kellaway
ishmaelnb@verizon.net
January 24, 2006